The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury

Short Title:
The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury
Model System:
TBI
Reference Type:
Journal Article
Accession No.:
Journal:
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Year, Volume, Issue, Page(s):
2008, vol. 89, issue 5, pp 950-957
Publication Website:
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the predictive validity of a brief neuropsychologic test battery consisting of the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test, the California Verbal Learning Test-II, Trail-Making Test (TMT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test, grooved pegboard, phonemic and categorical word generation tasks, the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 relative to functional outcome at 1 year in persons with traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Inception cohort study. Follow-up period of 12 months. SETTING: Seven Traumatic Brain Injury Model System centers. Neuropsychologic testing was conducted during the acute inpatient rehabilitation stay and functional outcome measures were obtained at 1-year outpatient follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=174) who met criteria for admission to inpatient brain injury rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FIM instrument, Disability Rating Scale, Supervision Rating Scale, Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. RESULTS: Multiple regression analyses revealed that performance on the neuropsychologic test battery was predictive of outcome at 1 year postinjury for all outcome measures, except FIM motor scores and the SWLS. Cognitive performance using this battery was found to predict 1-year outcomes above and beyond functional variables and injury severity variables collected during inpatient rehabilitation, thereby indicating incremental validity for this test battery. Individual tests that were found to be significant predictors of 1-year outcomes included the WTAR and TMT part B. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the clinical utility and ecological validity of this battery with respect to level of disability, functional independence, and supervision required.
Author(s):
Hanks, R. A.; Millis, S. R.; Ricker, J. H.; Giacino, J. T.; Nakase-Richardson, R.; Frol, A. B.; Novack, T. A.; Kalmar, K.; Sherer, M.; Gordon, W. A.
Author Address(es):
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. rhanks@med.wayne.edu

Some items may be available for document delivery from the National Rehabilitation Information Center. Make a note of the title and any accession number and contact NARIC at 800-346-2742 to request a copy. There is a charge for document delivery from the NARIC collection.