A mixed methods evaluation of the brain injury family intervention

Short Title:
Model System:
Reference Type:
Journal Article
Accession No.:
Year, Volume, Issue, Page(s):
2010, vol. 27, issue , pp 19-29
Publication Website:
Study compared caregivers’ and patients’ helpfulness and goal attainment ratings of the Brain Injury Family Intervention (BIFI), and qualitatively evaluated their perceptions of the most important things learned. Seventy-six caregivers and 76 patients with acquired brain injury participated in the BIFI, a structured family intervention program which includes educational, skill building, and psychological support components. Outcome measures were obtained following each of the five intervention sessions and following completion of the entire program. Session helpfulness ratings for caregivers and patients were uniformly high as were ratings of the extent to which session goals were met. Between-group comparisons did not indicate differences for individual session-helpfulness or goal-attainment ratings. Qualitative analysis of the most important things learned provided evidence that BIFI topics were relevant and consistent with program goals. The findings provide evidence that the BIFI is perceived as helpful and that treatment methods facilitate achievement of goals. The results also suggest that investigators may benefit from using mixed methods to evaluate outcomes, complementing traditional quantitative methods with qualitative approaches.
Kreutzer, JS; Stejskal, TM; Godwin, EE; Power, VD; Arango-Lasprilla, JC
Author Address(es):

Some items may be available for document delivery from the National Rehabilitation Information Center. Make a note of the title and any accession number and contact NARIC at 800-346-2742 to request a copy. There is a charge for document delivery from the NARIC collection.