Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research

Short Title:
Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research
Model System:
SCI
Reference Type:
Journal Article
Accession No.:
Journal:
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Year, Volume, Issue, Page(s):
2008, vol. 31, issue 2, pp 133-144
Publication Website:
Abstract:
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The end goal of clinical care and clinical research involving spinal cord injury (SCI) is to improve the overall ability of persons living with SCI to function on a daily basis. Neurologic recovery does not always translate into functional recovery. Thus, sensitive outcome measures designed to assess functional status relevant to SCI are important to develop. METHOD: Evaluation of currently available SCI functional outcome measures by a multinational work group. RESULTS: The 4 measures that fit the prespecified inclusion criteria were the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). The MBI and the QIF were found to have minimal evidence for validity, whereas the FIM and the SCIM were found to be reliable and valid. The MBI has little clinical utility for use in the SCI population. Likewise, the FIM applies mainly when measuring burden of care, which is not necessarily a reflection of functional recovery. The QIF is useful for measuring functional recovery but only in a subpopulation of people with SCI, and substantial validity data are still required. The SCIM is the only functional recovery outcome measure designed specifically for SCI. CONCLUSIONS: The multinational work group recommends that the latest version of the SCIM (SCIM III) continue to be refined and validated and subsequently implemented worldwide as the primary functional recovery outcome measure for SCI. The QIF may continue to be developed and validated for use as a supplemental tool for the nonambulatory tetraplegic population.
Author(s):
Anderson, K.; Aito, S.; Atkins, M.; Biering-Sorensen, F.; Charlifue, S.; Curt, A.; Ditunno, J.; Glass, C.; Marino, R.; Marshall, R.; Mulcahey, M. J.; Post, M.; Savic, G.; Scivoletto, G.; Catz, A.
Author Address(es):
Reeve-Irvine Research Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-1385, USA. kanderso@uci.edu
Participating Centers:

Some items may be available for document delivery from the National Rehabilitation Information Center. Make a note of the title and any accession number and contact NARIC at 800-346-2742 to request a copy. There is a charge for document delivery from the NARIC collection.